Study: Establishments are Eager for In-House Circuit Card Prototyping

Polling of printed circuit board (PCB) designers and manufacturers, domestic electrical engineers, OEMs and other people attracted to 3D-printed PCBs and circuits reveals that there exists increasing request for internal prototyping for study and product development. The desire is incredibly keen among businesses that pay out as much or more than $100,000 every year for prototyping services.


Of the in excess of 975 respondents – that represent 31 industries and disciplines and 25 nations – involved in the market research executed by Nano Dimension Ltd., 70 percent shell out up to $50,000 and 14 % said they spend more than $50,000 each year on PCB board prototyping. Furthermore, a full 16 %, or 142 answerers, are forking over at least $100,000 to outsourcing prototyping vendors on a yearly basis. The vast majority of respondents revealed that the prototyping rates were high basically because they call for the fabrication of complex, multi-layer PCB boards – with 66 percent of the people interviewed explaining their designs entail multiple layers.

While upwards of 9 in 10 respondents pointed out their firms rely on off-site prototyping facilities now, more or less 2 in three pointed out they believe their intellectual property (IP) is in peril if they do this. Most suggest they require alternatives for producing their own PCB boards in house.

“Designers and technical engineers clearly wish for quicker turn-around times and lessened danger every time mailing out their design documents for prototyping,” said Simon Fried, Nano Dimension’s Chief Business Officer and a corporation co-founder. “But with nearly all of the assembly houses located in China, timeliness has never been an option. In actual fact, many times they end up with circuit cards for production which aren’t optimized as much as they want mainly because of the long lead times. And submitting designs usually rises the odds which the IP might be replicated or taken.”

Despite the fact that the prototyping houses are well reputable partners, the time constraints regarding outsourcing can restrict innovation. So many designers depend on “safe” circuit card designs rather than exploring new ideas in case they may trigger a multitude of iterations – and extra delays – with the prototyping factory.

“With advanced substitutes such as Nano Dimension’s DragonFly 2020 3D Printer, the electronics industries can finally catch up to other forms of manufacturing which have benefited from additive manufacturing,” Fried said. “Our survey displays the desire exists, and the market is all set for 3D-printed circuit boards which can be manufactured on-site efficiently and affordably.”

Nano Dimension, an innovator in 3D printed electronics, presents the investigation on its website. Answerers speak for industries which range from circuit board makers and OEMs to engineering, defense, manufacturing, aerospace, electronics, medical, detectors and wearables, telecoms, energy and the others.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *